"As John Cage has insisted "there is no such thing as silence. Something is always happening that makes a sound....Similarly, there is no such thing as empty space. As long as a human eye is looking there is always something else to see. To look at something that's "empty" is still to be looking, still to be seeing something -- if only the ghosts of one's own expectations."
-- Susan Sontag, 'The Aesthetics of Silence'
‘Realised Mysticism’: The Use of Voice in Two Films by Carl Th. Dreyer
by Dalia Neis (taken from www.closeupfilmcentre.com):
"The American composer John Cage defined a new level of listening to sounds through the simple observation of the sound process: “New music: new listening. Not an attempt to understand something that is being said, for, if something were being said, the sound would be given the shapes of words. Just an attention to the activity of sounds” [10]. The Passion of Joan of Arc operates through a similar process; through the inconsistency of the intertitles, the spectator is forced to readjust to a new kind of aural experience. We watch out for the intentions and particular tones of the voice, rather than the literal meaning of the spoken and written words. [11] The contrast of the interrogators’ physical gestures to those of Joan of Arc are extreme: Her mouth does not move, it remains fixed, what moves is her hands. Her reaction to the horror that her interrogators impose on her is to clasp her mouth, grab her neck and cover her ears. It is these gestures that on one level can be read to express her muteness, her lack of voice in contrast to her interrogators. (In fact, it is this reading which governsMark Nash’s and David Bordwell’s understanding of the voice.) Yet on another level, it could be read as her last desperate plea for the internal, visionary voice to transcend and prevail over the authoritative voices of her interrogators. Through pointing to her throat, her mouth and ears, she touches and alludes to the mechanism of voice, the limits of these external organs to articulate a voice, and to the limits of her interrogators’ voice. She points to the inner voice which will never surrender to the voice of authority and law. Dreyer writes about ‘realized mysticism’, referring to the gestures behind the look, the soul that is turned inside out. Through holding her mouth and holding her ears she becomes deaf and dumb to the outside external world and reaches within, concentrating on evoking the internal voice. Her gestures also seem to take on the archetypal and familiar image of the scream, associatively referring us to the infamous Munch painting of same name."
from ‘Realised Mysticism’: The Use of Voice in Two Films by Carl Th. Dreyer
by Dalia Neis (taken from www.closeupfilmcentre.com)
'I'm too sad to tell you' by Bas Jan Ader (1971)
"Although the work is silent, there are moments when we might hear his crying -- it is there, like a lost soundtrack that comes to ghost the image......The shouts traced above- and all shouts, songs, and cries in general -no doubt have as their ultimate horizon that of the scream. To return to Edvard Munch's The Scream, the mouth in the midst of such gaping emptiness opens the way toward hearing what is so often unable to be spoken of"
-- Brandon La Belle, Lexicon of the Mouth: Poetics and Politics of Voice and the Oral Imaginary
Laocoön and His Sons [detail]
"The hyper-violent ending of Pier Paolo Pasolini's Salo (1976) is most savage due to its removal of screams from the soundtrack. As young men and women lie stomach down in a sandy courtyard and have their tongues cut out and scalps pried back, the soundtrack indifferently hisses with recorded silence and optically encoded crackles. We see their mouths open wide in screams we do not hear. The voyeuristic distance we enjoy from the spectacle is contracted and thrust inward to us as we are refused the pleasure of the scream as both aural cum shot and iconic softener for the extreme actions visually depicted. Due to the cinema's incessant employment of the scream as a sonic simulacrum for that which cannot be shown, the atypical apparition of a silenced scream on the soundtrack presents the cinematic apparatus as an inverted audiovisual machine, here psychologically amplifying the scream by muting it in the mix. The machinic effects of the cinematic apparatus are painfully apparent in Salo's finale: it is like the cinema itself has been technologically short-circuited, blowing out the speakers and upsetting any intended audiovisual normality. Silent footage and extreme violence tend to go hand in hand 2, and have established a semiotic effect of morbidity which cinema usually avoids. Stan Brakhage's The Act Of Seeing With One's Own Eyes (1972) unsettles the stomach as a coroner operates on a range of bodies in total cinematic silence. The withholding of the expected squelching creates a vacuum of clinical silence in the morgue. As hushed witnesses we are refused all form of bodily and psychological catharsis through psychoacoustic triggers: breath, voice, scream, music, etc. Instead we must stare blankly as the scalp of a patient is rolled down the front of his face and clamped in his mouth while the skull is sawn open to remove his brain. The image is most disorienting; its silence most disquieting"
-- 'I Scream in Silence' by Philip Brophy

